"automatic impact phenomenon, and global instant that occurs in the field of social, economic and financial, which is caused mainly by the combined action of information technology and communications, and mass media. Uncontrolled globalization is having negative effects that are undergoing significant social opposition and being studied by governments in order to implement control mechanisms, among which is the so-called Tobin Tax, which would tax international financial flows. expansion of capital markets, goods, services, labor and information across national borders. political, economic, social and ecological currently taking place at planetarium, for which there is increasingly greater economic interaction between them and other places, by far they are under the control of big business capitalists ( http://www.definicion.org/globalizacion ). It seems A complete definition and can satisfy Drop In, but I think this may be only one possible definition of this phenomenon, because we can not so universally accepted answer in this question: so what is undeniable is that the Globalization is a phenomenon that raises many different debates. So my idea is that if you ask a definition to someone living in Europe, responded to a very than someone living in Africa or India, probably because they have known this phenomenon for all purposes, which are numerous in different countries. I want to emphasize the aspect that is most innovative and makes the difference between "globalization" and "globalization", which represents the process of internationalization of politics and economics of the countries until 20 years ago, when mostly through the innovation and technical systems training began the phenomenon of globalization. For me most innovative l'aspect has been the creation of a new space where communication: a virtual and digital, other than a place to meet, and Internet is the basis of this innovation, and eliminates the problem of barriers to communication practices between countries distant from one another. The result is a new way of looking at relationships between people and countries, different cultures and realities. This does not mean that solves all problems to communicate with other countries, and indeed we must consider that there are many cultural barriers puedon not remove this space, but represents a way to begin to know and keep in touch easier than before . Then this phenomenon has led to workers who want to improve their working life, to specialize also considering options outside of its borders, now more than ever. Finally It is these characteristics that make possible the overall economy, and the difference to the process of "globalization" that existed before, is the level of improvement, legalization and formalization of the systems. As I said, many questions attached to this phenomenon, and a theme that is particularly important is what is observed such effects in different cultures, mainly, the gap between developed countries that participate actively in this process of continuous knowledge and third world countries or developing, is that the latter always seem to further this improvement with respect to technology and not participating in the process of change, but holding it, introducendo a global culture without the possibility of protecting their own culture. In fact, my view is that culture "global" is not the result of an exchange between different cultures but the diffusion of a culture (in particular a culture ocidental), extending in different countries to adapt the minimum possible to be accepted. On the other hand I think the term "global" refers not to the content of this culture but its diffusion.
Just think about some names of multinationals that are present in almost all countries, which owe their success or a good part of it to his popularity: McDonald's, Footlocker, Nike, Coke, Pepsi, ... and many more. Particularly significant
consider the case of McDonald's fast-food restaurant's success, as long as they know it's not so healthy. This example invites us to reflect on the causes of their success, and my conclusion is that its strength is that it represents a meeting point in all countries, but "it is better known evil than good to know " by what many people prefer to eat there before trying something new. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment